Is political risk overemphasised in FDI research

Is political risk overemphasised in FDI research

Blog Article

Studies suggest that the prosperity of multinational corporations within the Middle East hinges not only on economic acumen, but additionally on understanding and integrating into local cultures.

This social dimension of risk management calls for a shift in how MNCs work. Conforming to regional traditions is not just about understanding business etiquette; it also requires much deeper social integration, such as for example understanding local values, decision-making styles, and the societal norms that influence business practices and employee behaviour. In GCC countries, successful business relationships are made on trust and individual connections instead of just being transactional. Additionally, MNEs can benefit from adapting their human resource management to reflect the cultural profiles of local employees, as factors influencing employee motivation and job satisfaction vary widely across cultures. This requires a shift in mindset and strategy from developing robust economic risk management tools to investing in cultural intelligence and local expertise as experts and attorneys such Salem Al Kait and Ammar Haykal in Ras Al Khaimah may likely suggest.

Regardless of the political uncertainty and unfavourable fiscal conditions in a few areas of the Middle East, foreign direct investment (FDI) in the region and, particularly, in the Arabian Gulf has been gradually increasing in the last two decades. The relevance of the Middle East and Gulf markets is growing for FDI, and the associated risk is apparently essential. Yet, research regarding the risk perception of multinationals in the area is lacking in amount and quality, as experts and attorneys like Louise Flanagan in Ras Al Khaimah would likely attest. Although various empirical studies have examined the effect of risk on FDI, many analyses have largely been on political risk. However, a brand new focus has appeared in recent research, shining a spotlight on an often-overlooked aspect namely cultural factors. In these pioneering studies, the researchers remarked that businesses and their management often really overlook the effect of cultural factors as a result of not enough knowledge regarding social variables. In reality, some empirical research reports have discovered that cultural differences lower the performance of multinational enterprises.

A lot of the present literature on risk management strategies for multinational corporations features particular uncertainties but omits uncertainties that are tough to quantify. Certainly, a lot of research within the worldwide management field has focused on the handling of either political risk or foreign exchange uncertainties. Finance and insurance literature emphasises the danger factors which is why hedging or insurance coverage instruments can be developed to mitigate or move a company's risk visibility. Nevertheless, recent research reports have brought some fresh and interesting insights. They have sought to fill the main research gaps by providing empirical information about the risk perception of Western multinational corporations and their management methods on the firm level within the Middle East. In one investigation after gathering and analysing data from 49 major worldwide companies which are have extensive operations in the GCC countries, the authors found the following. Firstly, the risk connected with foreign investments is obviously much more multifaceted compared to frequently cited factors of political risk and exchange rate visibility. Cultural risk is regarded as more important than political risk, monetary risk, and financial risk. Secondly, despite the fact that aspects of Arab culture are reported to really have a strong influence on the business environment, most firms battle to adapt to local routines and traditions.